Always Learning

Posts for ‘Uncategorized’

CourseConnect Partners in Education: Kelly Kirk

by admin
Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

EQUELLA: Getting Started with a Digital Repository

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

EDUCAUSE 2011: Solutions Demonstration Schedule

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

We are looking forward to EDUCAUSE 2011! Please join us at booth #1210 for our solutions demonstrations or visit us online at www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/educause.

Solutions Demonstration Schedule

Wednesday, October 19th
Pearson LearningStudio 12:40 – 12:50pm
Searchable Lecture Capture Software 1:00 – 1:10pm
Centralizing Content Resources 1:20 – 1:30pm
Live, Online Tutoring 24/7 1:40 – 1:50pm
Pearson Integrated MyLabs 2:00 – 2:10pm
Thursday, October 20th
Live, Online Tutoring 24/7 10:00 – 10:10am
Searchable Lecture Capture Software 10:20 – 10:30am
Pearson Integrated MyLabs 11:40 – 11:50am
Integrating Assessment with Online Courses 12:20 – 12:30pm
Centralizing Content Resources 12:40 – 12:50pm
Pearson LearningStudio 3:30 – 3:40pm
Customizing Online/Blended Courses 3:50 – 4:00pm

The Evolution of Learning

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

Pearson Webinar Series

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

Pearson webinars will give you insight into the wide range of content, technology and services that our educational partners use to drive their learning programs forward. Learn how to select the right solutions for your needs by hearing directly from our customers and product experts about their experiences. Join us for the webinars that are most appropriate to your interests.

Wednesday, September 7 – 1:00 pm EST
The End of Proctoring? Best Practices for Student ID

Presented by: Dr. Mark Sarver, Chief Executive Officer, EduKan and Jeff Maynard, President and Founder, Biometric Signature ID

Thursday, September 22 – 1:00 pm EST
Using Classroom and Skills Capture to attract, engage, retain, and track student performance in education programs

Presented by: Eric Burns, Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer, Panopto and Rosemarie Console, Director of K-20 Education, Panopto

Register today!

From the Desk of Jeff Borden: College Readiness

by Jeff Borden
Monday, August 29th, 2011

I’m writing this at 35,000 feet and I’m worried. I think it’s only me though. The guy next to me is playing Angry Birds, the man in front of me is reading the NY Times, and the mom and daughter behind me are playing some kind of color and numbers card game. But none of them is worried.

Mind you, I’m not worried about the plane going down or the wing falling off. I’ve flown over 150,000 miles this year and if that was my phobia, I should find another line of work. No, I’m worried about something that many of you are probably worried about too, although likely with a different spin. You see, I’m worried about school. I’m worried about readiness. I’m worried about Addie.

My four year old started pre-school last year. She absolutely loved her first day, walking away from the car with a wave and a, “See you guys later!” My wife cried for a week but Addie was in her element. Ms. Shannon’s class was exactly what she needed: supportive, academic, structured, and fun.

Here we are, a year later and a year wiser. Addie has grown up a lot in a year. And since pre-school started again last week my wife and I have to answer a big question. Is she ready for kindergarten?

See, she’ll turn 5 a month before kindergarten starts next year. That means she will be one of the youngest in her class throughout all of her education. Is that a domino effect that my wife and I should start or should we allow her to wait one more year, with another year of psychological, emotional, and physical development? It is a very tough question. Researchers and writers from Gladwell to E Dhuey to Lubotsky have (controversially) suggested that younger classmates have “catching up to do” and are diagnosed with ADHD more than their older counterparts. Young students are typically followers instead of leaders and even test worse for schools in NCLB standardized tests.

Of course my mind goes to psycho-social aspects of her development. She’ll be surrounded by kids driving a year before she will get a license. She’ll be surrounded by girls who are interested in boys a year earlier than normal. In fact, the boys argument alone makes me want to forget kindergarten next year and go straight for a convent…but that’s another discussion.

As you can see, we have some thinking to do. But in the midst of all my own personal angst, it made me think of you. Why? Because you too are getting ready for students to come back. New students, young students, non-traditional students – they are all getting ready to start another Fall term. College readiness is on a LOT of your hearts and minds right about now.

But the questions surrounding my little girl are important to keep in mind I think. See, it seems that every level of education is a gateway to something. Whether a student is moving on with education, getting a job, or starting a family, the tools we give (or don’t give) them when we have them are extremely important.

Specific to college, I think about the myriad of surveys I have seen which describe tremendous employee gaps in skills and thinking. Of course these trouble me and likely you too. I think of Oxford’s employer survey in (2008) where EU and North American leaders suggested skills of major importance were only identified 15% of the time in new, college educated employees. Or the Scottish survey where industry leaders said of newly graduated and hired employees, “Where skills problems arise this is mainly because of weaknesses in softer core skills such as planning and organizing, customer handling, problem solving and team working (2010).” Or the Conference board survey report which explained, “U.S. employers continue to struggle with finding new hires who have not just the basic skills, but also higher-level critical thinking and creativity skills, according to a new report from The Conference Board. Since the education system is not supplying young workers with these skills, companies may have to devote more of their own resources to bringing workers up to their required skill levels. Some options include providing internships and working more closely with community colleges. The goal should be to prepare workers before they go out into the job market (2011).”

These reports and dozens, possibly hundreds of others show major skill deficits in all of the “Big C’s” as I like to say:

  • Computer competency
  • Creativity
  • Communication
  • Critical thinking
  • Customer Service
  • Collaboration
  • Cultural awareness
  • (Notice employers don’t talk about weaknesses in math, science, history, etc.?)

So what can WE do about it? Obviously teaching our students in the same way we have for generations is not the answer. It just isn’t working anymore. We’ve changed, the students have changed, society has changed, the marketplace has changed, and on and on. It’s time to stop teaching our single subject in a vacuum and piece together curriculum that is holistic as well as individualized, comprehensive yet specific, and altogether more useful. It’s time to realize that we have an important job beyond just teaching math, science, history, etc. – we have to prepare them for whatever is next.

I think back to my daughter. My wife and I could put her into a situation where she has a lot to overcome. We could bank on the notion that she will eventually catch up and will likely be “fine”… Of course, we want more than “fine” for her. And why would we, as parents put her into a situation where she even needs to catch up? Why wouldn’t we give her every opportunity to succeed decidedly?

Why wouldn’t we also do that for our students in college? Yes, for some of us that means teaching out of our comfort zone. It means leaving the lecture that we’ve known for 20 years and finding new, innovative ways to reach students in a more meaningful way. It means accepting technology as a valuable life-skill and an amazingly powerful toolset and not simply as a distraction. It means collaborating with our own peers to create curriculum integration experiences, gamifying our courses, and creating safe places for our students to fail.

Are your students ready to come back to school? I think the better question is, are YOU ready for them? Good luck and good teaching.

Jeff D Borden, M.A.
Sr. Director of Teaching & Learning

Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers: www.gladwell.com/outliers/index.html

Elizabeth Dhuey’s work: http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~edhuey/index.php/home/page/publications

Darren Lubotsky’s work: Kindergarten Entrance Age and Children’s Achievement: Impacts of State Policies, Family Background, and Peers

Scottish Employer Survey of Employee Skills: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Economy/labour-market/national-context/employers-views

The Conference Board survey results: http://www.conference-board.org/

Bridging the Skills gap analysis from ASTD: http://www.astd.org/NR/rdonlyres/FB4AF179-B0C4-4764-9271-17FAF86A8E23/0/BridgingtheSkillsGap.pdf

Pearson LearningStudio Instructor’s Tip: Using Enterprise Reporting to Impact Student Success

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Monday, August 29th, 2011

Written by: Kim Harwell, Reporting Analyst and Consultant, Pearson

Over the years I’ve heard it over and over again, students planning to take an online class because they’re convinced it’s “easier” than a traditional course. The good news is this perception seems to be changing. Everyone is figuring out that the online course can be an effective and engaging environment for learning. However, for those who aren’t aware yet and for those who are, one of the best things faculty can do to help students be successful in the online environment is to appropriately set expectations. As instructors we can make sure they are aware, as soon as they log into class, approximately how much time will be required of them.

In this age of information and technology, data is power. Enterprise Reporting is a tool made available to Pearson LearningStudio administrators that makes it possible to view a variety of course data. As an instructor, you can ask your administrators to pull student activity time specifically for your courses, over the last several terms or even for all of the terms you’ve taught. They can even combine the activity information with final grades for the students who completed your course (either anonymously or not). You can, in turn, use this information to help your students understand the time and effort they can expect to dedicate to your course. Enterprise Reporting can even help you understand WHERE students spend their time. We can break total time down to let them know which features demand most of the student’s time. Take a look at these examples:

What powerful information to have! Powerful for you as an instructor to know what your course generally requires and powerful to be able to share that information with your students. Sharing these small bits of information improves their ability to manage their time appropriately and therefore increase the likelihood of success!

ACE and Pearson Collaborate to Transform GED Test, Aligned With Common Core State Standards, Based on GED 21st Century Initiative

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Friday, March 25th, 2011

The American Council on Education (ACE) and Pearson announced the creation of a ground-breaking new business that will drive the future direction, design, and delivery of the GED® testing program. Building on the goals of the GED 21st Century Initiative, the two partners will combine their collective expertise and resources to develop a new GED Test aligned with Common Core State Standards that will assure colleges, universities and prospective employers that adults who have passed the GED Tests are prepared to compete and succeed in a global economy.

Read the full story here.

More from:

New York Times
Chronicle of Higher Education
Education Week

Inside Higher Ed 

Pearson Prize Application – deadline, March 18th!

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Thursday, March 17th, 2011

The Pearson Foundation is awarding Pearson Prize Fellowships to 70 students in recognition of their academic achievement and commitment to local communities. Applications for the 2011 Pearson Prize for Higher Education are being accepted through March 18, 2011.

The Pearson Prize offers:

  • 20 Pearson Prize National Fellows a cash award of $10,000;
  • 50 Pearson Prize Community Fellows a cash award of $500;
  • Access to unique student resources and opportunities from the Pearson Foundation and from Pearson, the world’s leading learning company.

The Pearson Prize recognizes students who have:

  • Been attending a two- or four-year school, or private sector college or university;
  • Completed at least one year of college, or six months of an eighteen-month private sector program;
  • Demonstrated leadership in community service.

Apply Now

•     Visit pearsonfoundation.org/pearsonprize to apply for the Pearson Prize;

•     Completed applications must be received by March 18, 2011;

•     Scholarship recipients will be notified by July 8, 2011.

Learn More: http://pearsonfoundation.org/pearsonprize/  

Educator’s Voice: Ethical Codes and Their Application

by Pearson Learning Solutions
Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

Ethical Codes and their Application

Written By: Ken Switzer, Ph.D.
Senior Academic Trainer & Consultant, Pearson eCollege

Introduction

The instruction of students and related activities in the area of education should be based on a code of ethics for the educational professional as educators carry out a wide variety of instructional duties whether in the classroom, blended classroom or online courseroom .

Education is intimately connected with ethics, because holistically speaking education is more than simply passing examination and acquiring degrees. . . the . . . educator makes a positive, ethical and interventionist role by helping students to learn beyond the stereotypical classroom situation. . . (Demiray & Sharma, 2009)

Often educators’ discussion of ethical behavior focuses on “the principle of nonmaleficence that can best be summarized in the moral injunction: Above all, do no harm.” (Spinello, 2011) Frequently, in this line of discussion, educators emphasize student behavior. For example, we admonish students concerning plagiarism of other’s work which harms the student and, theoretically, the readers of the student’s material.

With regard to themselves interacting with students, educators tend to focus on educational ethics as behaviors that emphasize positive outcomes in the learning environment, or beneficence. For example, educators in the online environment are generally concerned with establishing a viable instructor presence and developing a robust learning community.

Codes of Ethics in Education

Educators should be aware of and, in theory, bound by various professional codes of ethics. Whether clearly articulated as a code of ethics or presented as ethical guidelines for carrying out professional duties, it behooves instructors in every educational environment to consider how such ethical codes can be applied to themselves and their conduct in carrying out their professional duties with regard to the student, the institution and the profession. Similarly, it can also be argued that there is a professional duty with regard to parents, the community and the funding sources for educational programs though these are seldom addressed in our discussions.

Professional associations such as the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) provide codes of ethics for their members. The NEA’s code places an emphasis on the two areas of commitment to the student and commitment to the profession (NEA, 2011). The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) has a similar Statement on Professional Ethics as noted below (AAUP, 2011). The AAUP notes that these are guidelines for the profession with no enforcement action other than that taken at the institutional level. In the related field of training the International Society for Performance Improvement (ISPI) has a code of ethics similar to those of professional education associations, with six principles guiding behavior in the training environment (ISSPI, 2011).

AAUP Statement on Professional Ethics

  1. Professors, guided by a deep conviction of the worth and dignity of the advancement of knowledge, recognize the special responsibilities placed upon them. Their primary responsibility to their subject is to seek and to state the truth as they see it. To this end, professors devote their energies to developing and improving their scholarly competence. They accept the obligation to exercise critical self-discipline and judgment in using, extending, and transmitting knowledge. They practice intellectual honesty. Although professors may follow subsidiary interests, these interests must never seriously hamper or compromise their freedom of inquiry.
  2. As teachers, professors encourage the free pursuit of learning in their students. They hold before them the best scholarly and ethical standards of their discipline. Professors demonstrate respect for students as individuals and adhere to their proper roles as intellectual guides and counselors. Professors make every reasonable effort to foster honest academic conduct and to ensure that their evaluations of students reflect each student’s true merit. They respect the confidential nature of the relationship between professor and student. They avoid any exploitation, harassment, or discriminatory treatment of students. They acknowledge significant academic or scholarly assistance from them. They protect their academic freedom.
  3. As colleagues, professors have obligations that derive from common membership in the community of scholars. Professors do not discriminate against or harass colleagues. They respect and defend the free inquiry of associates, even when it leads to findings and conclusions that differ from their own. Professors acknowledge academic debt and strive to be objective in their professional judgment of colleagues. Professors accept their share of faculty responsibilities for the governance of their institution.
  4. As members of an academic institution, professors seek above all to be effective teachers and scholars. Although professors observe the stated regulations of the institution, provided the regulations do not contravene academic freedom, they maintain their right to criticize and seek revision. Professors give due regard to their paramount responsibilities within their institution in determining the amount and character of work done outside it. When considering the interruption or termination of their service, professors recognize the effect of their decision upon the program of the institution and give due notice of their intentions.
  5. As members of their community, professors have the rights and obligations of other citizens. Professors measure the urgency of these obligations in the light of their responsibilities to their subject, to their students, to their profession, and to their institution. When they speak or act as private persons, they avoid creating the impression of speaking or acting for their college or university. As citizens engaged in a profession that depends upon freedom for its health and integrity, professors have a particular obligation to promote conditions of free inquiry and to further public understanding of academic freedom.

Reflection

Statement one emphasizes knowledge in the instructor’s field of study and expertise. It is interesting that the majority of instructors at the higher education level have received no training in “education” per se or in online education. The AAUP statement addresses only the content area, such as biology or composition. As professional educators, what responsibility should we have to be “experts” in the field of education to at least the degree of understanding such areas as the design of measurable learning objectives, the effective delivery of content, and the assessment of students through multiple approaches?

Statement four notes that professors should seek to be “effective teachers.” As noted in Statement 1, instructors have commonly received no training in how to be an effective instructor. As professional educators in online education, what responsibility should we have to understand what is “effective?” For example, how does one show a full range of instructor presence in a course and how does one establish and maintain a viable learning community for students?

Statements two and four address students to one degree or another. Statements one, three, four and five address responsibilities to the profession or institution. As professional educators in online education, what responsibility should we have to the larger community and to other stakeholders in education? For example, do we have a responsibility to the taxpayers whose taxes fund public institutions, or to shareholders if we are at a for-profit institution? Do we have a responsibility, if we are at a public institution, to legislative bodies that set guidelines and provide funding? 

References

American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (2011) Statement on professional ethics. Retrieved February 4, 2011, from
http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/policydocs/contents/statementonprofessionalethics.htm

Demiray, U., & Sharma, R.C. (2009). Ethical practices and implications in distance education: an introduction. London: IGI Global.

International Society for Performance Improvement (ISPI) (2011) Code of ethics. Retrieved February 2, 2011, from

http://www.ispi.org/content.aspx?id=418&terms=code+of+ethics

National Education Association (NEA) (2011) Code of ethics. Retrieved February 2, 2011, from

http://www.nea.org/home/30442.htm

Spinello, Richard A. (2011). Cyberethics, morality and law in cyberethics (p. 22).
(4th ed.). Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.